Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research.
Cite As
Koskinen, I., & Rolin, K. (2022). Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 91, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.001
APA
MLA
Koskinen, Inkeri, and Kristina Rolin. “Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research.” Studies in history and philosophy of science vol. 91 (2022): 191-198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.001
License
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that the new demarcation problem does not need to be framed as the problem of defining a set of necessary and jointly sufficient criteria for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable roles that non-epistemic values can play in science. We introduce an alternative way of framing the problem and defend an open-ended list of criteria that can be used in demarcation. Applying such criteria requires context-specific work that clarifies which principles should be used, and possibly leads to the identification of new principles – which then can be added to the open-ended list. We illustrate our approach by examining a context where distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable value influences in science is both needed and tricky: transdisciplinary research.
Figures
Visual Abstract
Video Summary
View at The Collaborative Library Website
Related Work
Related work will show here.