top of page

How I Understood the Rankings Game and My Attempts to Fight It

The founder of India Research Watch on why he stopped chasing individual misconduct cases and took on university rankings.

Design by Luciana Machado (Canva Pro)

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

During my PhD in France in 2015, I was introduced to how the scientific process works and how it could be subverted. However, I was indifferent to misconduct. I knew the good journals in my field and did not want to waste my time reading low-quality papers or flagging them. This all changed when I joined a university that was doing very well in national and international rankings.



Targets that reward misconduct

When I joined a university that ranked well nationally and internationally, I expected to find high-quality research there. However, I was shocked to see unrealistic research targets imposed on academics, and how blatantly researchers committed misconduct to pump up the numbers. The unrealistic targets included producing five single-author conference articles a year, just to be considered an average performer. This was expected even with 16 hours of teaching per week and no laboratory resources, PhD students or funding. Not only were my colleagues achieving these targets, but they were far exceeding them, with some publishing over 50 research papers a year. The university lionized those very researchers and gave them “Best Researcher” awards. The few times I tried to call out the university’s incentive system, my colleagues sneered at my attempts. Things changed when I interacted with undergraduate students, who told me how professors were replacing assignments with research papers and teaching them how to plagiarize without getting caught. Some professors used to give students random instructions during lab sessions and instead work on their own research papers. I realized that the problem had gone far beyond the proverbial “few bad apples” and was massively affecting not just research but education as well.


How rankings shape choices

During this time, I also realized the massive influence university rankings have on students' and parents' decisions when choosing a college. This is because research outputs like the number of research papers and citation counts are easy to measure. However, these measures can also be easily gamed, which is what many universities are doing right now. For example, paper mills specialize in writing research papers for a fee. Some even help increase citation counts for a fee. All this helps many universities climb up the rankings, without meaningfully contributing to research.


Why I started India Research Watch

I conducted a small survey of the new batch of students who had joined the university, and almost 50% said they joined it because of the university’s performance in the



This article continues in the full issue,

which subscribers can read online



Rights and Permissions

© 2026 Science Integrity Alliance.

This article is restricted to subscribers and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission from SIA, except by the authors reusing their own work. To request permission, contact contactus@sci-integrity.com. Images are not covered by these terms; see their captions for credits and licenses.


Cite As

Achal Agrawal. How I Understood the Rankings Game and My Attempts to End It. REACH 2026;5(October):63–67.

REACH is the quarterly digital magazine of the Science Integrity Alliance, a coalition of more than 25 partners working to strengthen research integrity. Editor's Choice articles are open to everyone, and subscribers make that possible. In return, the SIA Subscription brings you together with people committed to improving research culture and transparency: full issues of REACH, discussion and practical advice in HIKE (our expert-led forum), bonus episodes of the SIAcast podcast, and the chance to participate in creating ATLAS, our living encyclopedia of key research concepts.

Join the Community Behind REACH​

bottom of page