The SIA Subscription is here, and we'd love you to be part of it
The SIA Subscription is now live, opening up a global community for everyone working to strengthen integrity, transparency and trust in research.
The subscription brings together resources, community spaces and practical support to help you apply research integrity in your day-to-day work.
Your subscription covers SIA's platforms:
REACH: every issue of SIA's quarterly digital magazine, with practical insights, commentary and emerging developments
HIKE: expert-led discussions where you can ask questions and exchange ideas with the wider community
ATLAS: help shape a growing encyclopedia of research integrity concepts, with acknowledgment for your contributions
88 Views
%20(30%20x%2046_8%20in)%20(5).png)
%20(30%20x%2046_8%20in)%20(3).png)
I don't think this rates inclusion in your list, as the following is just a single paragraph in a four-box series, but I was re-reading a classic science fiction novel recently - Julian May's The Golden Torc (1982) - and found that it mentions research misconduct! The context is when one character is giving their involvement in creating a key piece of technology years ago:
"I designed the original device at Berkeley, you know."
"I thought that Eisenmann -"
"I was a graduate student working under him. A young fool ... My work was promising, he said, but its potential might remain unrealised because I lacked the cachet necessary to attract Polity funding. However, if I worked under him there would be no problem. I was grateful and he was clever and the work was a resounding success. And now the entire Milieu knows Eisenmann the laureate. A few even remember Eusebio Gomez-Nolan, his faithful little assistant."
Though a fictional scenario in a fictional far-future, it's an all-too familiar situation.
"